|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Centrifical force |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The first of Kef's new Uni-Q's
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kef
Q1 loudspeaker. $999
Its simple economics. Rectangular-shaped boxes can be built to a relatively low price and, given that the cabinet can cost more than the drive units, you can see why speaker manufacturers use boxes. (Thats not to say that rectangular box speakers cant sound any good - they can and do). The complete range of Kefs Q-Series use non-rectangular boxes. They look refreshingly different because of it. So how does Kef do this? Probably a combination of careful engineering, watching the pennies and having the speakers made in China. The Q1 follows the general shape of the Q-Series - a flat front with sides that curve away. A smaller than normal rear panel is flat to house the binding posts for connecting up the speakers.
On top is another distinctive look - a pod which partially houses the UniQ driver. Im not sure if this is supposed to have any acoustical purpose, but t definitely has a visual one. Ive always thought that the older UniQ speakers looked as if the part of the cabinet holding the tweeter had been loped off. Not so now. All of the Q-series are available in Light Maple with a grey grille and "pod", Dark Apple or black, both with black grilles and "pods". Centred individual Below the UniQ is a port for bass loading. And here is my one problem with the look of these speakers: with the grill off you can easily see the crossover components through the port. In the box are two foam rubber bungs that may be placed in the port (no, not to hide the crossover, but for acoustical reasons). These bungs may prove useful to reduce bass output if the Q1s are too close to the walls or a corner. If the bass level is too high, insert the bungs. I really enjoyed my time with the Kef Q1s immensely. They had an open, dynamic and unified sound to them. Particularly noteworthy was the way that the Qs portrayed musical dynamics. Many speakers compress the expression of dynamics to a greater or lesser degree. The Q1s had the ability to track changes in musical dynamics very well. A great example was the large scale Carmina Burana by Carl Orff (Shaws version on Telarc). This orchestral and choir work has extreme dynamic contrasts; the Q1 tracked them very well and with great composure. Why is this important? Musicians use changes in dynamic shadings as a means to portray their musical message. Dynamics are as important to musical meaning as the tone of voices and instruments. And speaking of tone, the Q1s were well balanced tonally. The only real aberration was in the upper and mid bass, where the Q1s turns thick and pudgy. This has the effect of diminishing musical pace in rock and jazz music a bit, and lessening the differentiation of instruments in this area. Thanks to the guys at Smiths Sound, I had the opportunity to directly compare the the Q1 to the model it replaces, the Q15.2, as well as the Mission 780, a favourite small speaker of mine. It was immediately obvious that the Q1 is a big improvement
over its predecessor. The Q1 is noticeably cleaner sounding, more transparent
and more dynamic than the older model. Although considerably smaller, the Mission is far better in bass quality (that grumbliness of the Q1 coming through again). Circular thinking Want to comment on this review? Click here for Feedback
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
©
All contents copyright to AudioEnz unless noted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||